Skip to content
HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland
  • Home
  • About us
    • About us
    • What we do
      • What we do
      • Our organisation
      • Our values
      • Our corporate plan
      • Get involved
      • Annual statements of compliance
    • Our team
      • Our team
      • Craig Naylor
      • Brian McInulty
      • Rebecca Duncan
      • Ray Jones
      • Annie Crowley
      • Maggie Pettigrew
      • John Paterson
      • Jenny Morrison
      • Rhona Ford
      • Debbie Kyle
      • Pamela Colvin
      • Carly Bryce
      • Keri-Anne Balfour
      • Joanna Gardner
      • Ioanna Kiriklidou
    • Our history
      • Our history
      • Colonel John Grant Kinloch
      • Alexander Morrison
    • Partnership working
      • Partnership working
      • Healthcare Improvement Scotland
      • Care Inspectorate
      • National Preventive Mechanism (NPM)
      • Audit Scotland
      • HM Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland
  • Publications
    • Publications
    • Recommendations tracker
  • News
  • Our approach to scrutiny
    • Our approach to scrutiny
    • Our scrutiny plans
      • Our scrutiny plans
      • HMICS Scrutiny plan 2025-28
      • HMICS Scrutiny plan 2023 review
      • HMICS Scrutiny plan 2022-25 - update
      • HMICS Scrutiny plan 2022-25
      • HMICS Annual scrutiny plan 2021-22
      • HMICS Annual scrutiny plan 2020-21
      • HMICS Annual scrutiny plan 2019-20
      • HMICS Annual scrutiny plan 2018-19 - update
      • HMICS Annual scrutiny plan 2018-19
      • HMICS Annual scrutiny plan 2017-18 - update
      • HMICS Annual scrutiny plan 2017-18
      • HMICS Annual scrutiny plan 2016-17
      • HMICS Annual scrutiny Plan 2015-16
      • HMICS Annual scrutiny plan 2014-15
    • Our inspection framework
  • Contact
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Citing witnesses in the sheriff court

Citing witnesses in the sheriff court

Related Downloads

  • HMICS and IPS - Citing witnesses in the sheriff court
    PDF file, size 4.5 MB
Inspection reports

3rd March 2026

The aim of this inspection was to assess how effectively and efficiently prosecution witnesses are cited to give evidence in the sheriff court. This includes members of the public who have been the victim of a crime or who have witnessed a crime, as well as police and professional witnesses. The inspection has been carried out jointly by HM Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland (IPS) and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland (HMICS), which has allowed us to consider the citation process from both a prosecution and policing perspective.

Additional

  • Key findings
  • Recommendations
  • Areas for development
  • Context
  • Methodology
  • Outcomes
  • Direction
  • Delivery
  • Appendix A – key terms
  • Footnotes

  • Key findings
  • Recommendations
  • Areas for development
  • Context
  • Methodology
  • Outcomes
  • Direction
  • Delivery
  • Appendix A – key terms
  • Footnotes
Number Recommendation
1

COPFS and Police Scotland should:

(a) review the targets in the ‘Protocol for witness citation targets’ to take account of the business rules on automatic citing and removal of intermediate diets in summary case management cases. Compliance with these targets should be monitored and performance data analysed; and

(b) ensure all citation performance data is measurable and is collected, analysed and reported through governance structures to monitor performance across both organisations.

2

COPFS and Police Scotland should develop a clear and consistent method of identifying all costs associated with the citation process and police officer court attendance.

3

COPFS and Police Scotland should:

(a) develop aligned, service-wide strategies for effective and efficient citation of witnesses, taking into account the needs of all categories of witness; and

(b) publish information about commitments to witnesses and what witnesses should expect in the citation process.

4

COPFS and Police Scotland should ensure that there is clear and effective leadership of the citation process that takes account of the respective internal structures of each organisation.

5

COPFS and Police Scotland should ensure that information flows effectively between the framework of liaison meetings across both organisations at national and local levels, in order to manage the citation process consistently and comprehensively.

6

COPFS and Police Scotland should ensure that all relevant staff have a comprehensive understanding of the citation process, including the role of each organisation, the operating context and the impact of unsuccessful citation on the criminal justice system. This should include mandatory training as part of the induction process, and ongoing awareness training.

7

COPFS should:

(a) ensure that guidance on all parts of the citation process in summary, and sheriff and jury cases, are connected and reflect business rules in full;

(b) introduce an effective way of communicating changes to policy and guidance in the Local Court Business Process Handbook to staff; and

(c) ensure that all relevant staff are actively following the Local Court Business Process Handbook. Regular compliance monitoring must take place.

8

COPFS should review and update the ‘Lord Advocate’s guidelines to chief constables on the citation of witnesses’ and this should include the consequence of the removal of intermediate diets and the use by police officers of the Legal Document Database. Both COPFS and Police Scotland should ensure that staff are aware of the guidelines and their content.

9

COPFS and Police Scotland should provide information on the citation process on their websites.

10

COPFS should develop training on the citation of witnesses for administrative staff, to ensure consistency of practice. All relevant staff should undertake this training as soon as practicable.

11

Police Scotland should ensure that training in all elements of the citation process is up-to-date, delivered and refreshed at appropriate times, and in the most suitable format.

12

Police Scotland and COPFS should consider a method whereby witnesses who are giving statements to police officers are also advised that they may be required to give evidence in court.

13

Police Scotland should ensure that the Standard Prosecution Report contains information regarding: witness availability and contact details (including email addresses and phone numbers); and details about which police officers seized productions.

14

COPFS should introduce and maintain effective and formal quality assessment for the citation process and citation decisions, ensuring that any failures identified are reported to those with managerial oversight.

15

COPFS should:

(a) issue guidance on where discussions between the Crown and defence, and final decisions about agreement of evidence, should be recorded in the case management system to provide a consistent and identifiable record;

(b) issue guidance for case markers and local court staff on appropriate use and consequence of the ‘agree evidence’ facility in the case management system; and

(c) implement instructions and measures for prosecutors to link evidence capable of agreement and specific witnesses, at the marking stage.

16

COPFS should ensure all prosecutors engaged in the conduct of sheriff and jury business are aware of the content of the Sheriff Court Solemn Procedure Criminal Courts Practice No 1 of 2024 and are adequately trained on the contents to ensure compliance. Existing sheriff and jury prosecutors should undertake this training within six months of the publication of this inspection report, and prosecutors transferring to sheriff and jury teams should undertake relevant training within a month of their transfer.

17

COPFS should:

(a) ensure that the processes legislated for in the 2017 sheriff and jury reforms are given effect;

(b) publish guidance for staff on the witness engagement process;

(c) ensure that there are sufficient resources within the witness engagement team to give effect to this process;

(d) monitor that staff in COPFS local offices are following the witness engagement process; and

(e) monitor that written records are being completed with witness unavailability.

18

To improve court scheduling:

(a) the Scottish Government, COPFS, Police Scotland and SCTS should develop an integrated digital trial scheduling solution that takes account of all witness availability;

(b) until such a digital solution in (a) is realised COPFS and Police Scotland should

(i) work with SCTS to realise the benefits of the current police witness scheduler application; and

(ii) ensure that information is continuously gathered on all witness availability and is provided to SCTS in a manner that allows effective trial scheduling at both first trial assignation and adjourned trials.

19

COPFS should:

(a) ensure that staff engaged in sheriff and jury case preparation identify reluctant witnesses, attempt to engage them in the justice process and then, if necessary, cite such witnesses to first diets where appropriate; and

(b) work with Police Scotland to ensure that effective processes are in place for the issue and return of executions of service for witnesses cited to attend first diets.

20

COPFS should:

(a) work with SCTS to agree an effective national process on the transfer of sheriff and jury cases; and

(b) produce guidance for staff on the transfer of sheriff and jury cases between sheriff courts.

21

COPFS should:

(a) use the correct form of witness citation in solemn proceedings – as prescribed in the Act of Adjournal (Criminal Procedure Rules 1996 Amendment) (Witness Citations in Solemn Proceedings) 2023/276;

(b) audit and ensure that local procurator fiscal offices who may issue ‘on-demand’ citations are using the correct form of witness citations; and 

(c) work with the Scottish Government and justice partners to ensure that all witness citations are considered and revised where necessary to ensure that they are trauma-informed and use accessible language.

22

COPFS should ensure that correspondence included with the witness citation in sheriff and jury cases makes clear how many days the witness may need to be available to attend court.

23

COPFS should review how citations are issued to witnesses who do not use English as a first language when they have been notified of this by Police Scotland.

24

COPFS should review how child witness citations issued for personal service are prepared, to ensure that police officers are aware that they are serving a citation on a child and allow compliance with the relevant Lord Advocate’s Guidelines.

25

COPFS should develop a process to ensure that autocite is not applied for witnesses whose evidence has concluded in summary trials that are part-heard.

26

COPFS should investigate why sheriff court citations are issued for personal service other than in accordance with business rules and ensure that remedial action is taken where necessary.

27

COPFS should:

(a) investigate why on-demand citations are issued and take steps to minimise their use;  

(b) take steps to quantify and monitor the number of on-demand citations issued; and 

(c) work with Police Scotland to ensure that information regarding on-demand citations is recorded on the Legal Document Database/Legal Document Exchange systems.

28

COPFS should:

(a) introduce and monitor the use of a single document in which all citation records and information are recorded; and

(b) ensure that staff consistently carry out checks on the citation position and record the citation status for each witness in COPFS case management systems.

29

COPFS should implement and monitor a process to ensure that when witnesses change address, citations are issued to the correct address and Police Scotland staff serving citations are notified of the new address.

30

COPFS should:

(a) review the use of ‘return by’ dates printed on personal citations and ensure that the purpose of the date is understood by both COPFS and Police Scotland; and

(b) review the use of the term ‘execution date’ in COPFS case management systems.

31

COPFS should issue guidance in sheriff court cases on how and when citation status should be reviewed.

32

COPFS should:

(a) ensure that guidance for the witness management team staff is published internally;

(b) implement systems that allow the witness management team to prioritise work by trial date and monitor implementation of this;

(c) create processes to ensure effective information sharing between the witness management team and local offices;

(d) ensure that the witness management team is sufficiently resourced to be able to respond efficiently and timeously to returned citations and executions of service;

(e) prevent citations being printed and issued where there is no known address;

(f) prevent citations being issued to witnesses who have died; and

(g) implement a service improvement process arising from any systemic issues identified by the witness management team.

33

COPFS should cite professional witnesses by email and ensure that there are consistent and effective national standby arrangements for these witnesses.

34

The Scottish Police Authority Forensic Services should develop a consistent national approach and administrative process to manage court witness citations issued to forensic scientists.

35

Police Scotland should:

(a) explore whether a policy is required for police officers who incur carer costs, which cannot then be reimbursed when they are countermanded as a witness at short notice; and

(b) consider whether there is a need to clarify its policy on maternity procedures in relation to the process and impacts of being cited to court as a police witness while on maternity leave.

36

COPFS should:

(a) ensure that local offices are sufficiently resourced to allow for effective and timely case preparation including citation related issues and monitor key stages of case preparation, including (i) issue of citations, (ii) preparation of cases for court, and (iii) response rates for excusals and countermands as indicators of resource issue; and

(b) consider and monitor the role of the office depute.

37

In order to improve the witness excusal process:

(a) COPFS and Police Scotland should review, update and implement the ‘The Joint Protocol for the Excusal of Police Witnesses from attending Court between Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and the Police Service of Scotland’ dated August 2013;

(b) within six months of the date of this report, COPFS should implement a consistent national process on responding to sheriff court excusals and monitor compliance;

(c) COPFS should ensure that any targets set in relation to excusals can be measured and are achievable; and

(d) the importance of processing of excusal requests and the impact of not doing so on the justice system should feature in COPFS depute induction training packages and relevant administrative courses as per recommendations 6 and 10.

38

COPFS should implement IT solutions to:

(a) generate automated countermand emails to civilian and professional witnesses once email addresses are routinely included in police statements; and

(b) ensure that all Police Scotland countermand emails are automated from the COPFS case management system to the appropriate Police Scotland unit.

39

COPFS should:

(a) review the target for processing countermands to ensure it is assessed from the date on which the decision is made that the witness is no longer required; and

(b) consider implementing automated countermanding in summary cases.

In the interim, COPFS should address and monitor backlogs in case processing to allow countermands to be issued timeously and prior to autocitation for any new trial date.

40

COPFS should:

(a) develop an automated process to advise Police Scotland when witnesses are countermanded; and

(b) until such a digital solution in (a) is realised, and within three months of the publication of this report, issue guidance and train staff to ensure that Police Scotland is advised when witnesses are countermanded.

41

COPFS should implement effective quality assurance to consider why sheriff court cases are adjourned.

42

COPFS should work with justice partners to ensure that, when a trial is adjourned, there are processes for ensuring that trial dates are checked with witnesses prior to being assigned by the court.

43

COPFS should ensure that there is guidance for administrative staff on when copy documents from the citation storage system and the Legal Document Exchange should be uploaded to the case management system and what information should be provided to prosecutors.

44

Police Scotland should:

(a) ensure that all information on personal service of citations is recorded on the Legal Document Database; and

(b) review the current data retention period for the Legal Document Database to ensure that the information is retained for the life of the case.

45

Police Scotland, SPA, COPFS and SCTS should work together to widen the use of remote evidence for appropriate police and professional witnesses, to include summary, and sheriff and jury business.

46

COPFS should use email or other electronic methods as the principal means of citing witnesses.

47

COPFS should consider whether it is necessary for Police Scotland to complete and return paper executions of service in summary proceedings.

48

COPFS and Police Scotland must develop and embed digital approaches to delivering citations to ensure the number of personal citations officers of Police Scotland require to serve on witnesses is kept to a minimum.

49

COPFS should consider issuing a trauma-informed notice of trial date letter to witnesses by digital means, in the first instance, rather than a formal citation.

50

COPFS should cease automatic personal citation of witnesses who have been assessed as ‘hostile’ or ‘reluctant’ in the Standard Prosecution Report.

Introduction

The aim of this inspection was to assess how effectively and efficiently prosecution witnesses are cited to give evidence in the sheriff court. This includes members of the public who have been the victim of a crime or who have witnessed a crime, as well as police and professional witnesses.

The inspection has been carried out jointly by HM Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland (IPS) and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland (HMICS), which has allowed us to consider the citation process from both a prosecution and policing perspective.

In 2024/25, a total of 157,615 citations and 179,475 re-citations were issued in sheriff summary courts.[1] In the same year, 31,238 citations and 30,386 re-citations were issued in sheriff and jury courts. This amounts to 398,714 occasions on which witnesses’ lives were potentially affected and disrupted.

In 2024/25, 48,360 summary and 5,919 solemn cases called for trial in sheriff courts across Scotland. However, evidence was led in only 13% of summary and 21% of solemn cases.[2]  Many witnesses will have been cited to give evidence and attended court for trials that ultimately did not proceed.

While there are some signs of improvement across both organisations, we found that much work remains to be done by the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) and Police Scotland to reduce the impact of citation on witnesses – not least as most of those we heard from found the citation experience a negative one.

The personal and economic impact of the citation process on witnesses, the police and prosecution services, and the justice system have all been considered. Despite the high volume of citations issued, we found that COPFS and Police Scotland do not adequately monitor performance data on the citation process to allow for accurate identification of costs, issues, demand forecasting, or service improvement opportunities.

We looked at the current legal and policy frameworks for citing witnesses in the sheriff court; how COPFS and Police Scotland intend to deliver their obligations to cite witnesses to court; and to what extent the citation process is informed by an understanding of the current operating context and the needs of witnesses and the justice system.

We were particularly struck by the lack of oversight, leadership, governance, strategy and monitoring of the citation process across both organisations. This should be addressed as soon as possible to ensure the necessary improvements to what is an inefficient and largely outdated system.

We found that COPFS and Police Scotland training and awareness of the citations process was not as practical or effective as it should be. Nor did it take account of how fundamental citation of witnesses in the sheriff court is to the criminal justice system in Scotland.

This has led to many operational police and prosecution staff not fully understanding how their role operates as part of the wider citation process, or the interdependencies between COPFS and Police Scotland to ensure an efficient and effective process. We observed that this lack of knowledge has contributed to negative perceptions between staff in each organisation, which often hampered collaborative working. A culture shift is required to ensure positive change.

In considering the end-to-end citation process we found systemic failings from the outset across both organisations:

  • Police Scotland rarely obtains witness availability and sometimes does not obtain sufficient contact details when taking witness statements, leading to unsuitable court dates and citation challenges
  • When witnesses provide availability, this is rarely considered when trial dates are fixed, resulting in witness excusal requests, countermands (cancellations) and longer journey times of cases
  • COPFS failure to deal with witness excusal requests or countermands effectively or timeously is extremely impactful on all witnesses
  • Police Scotland faces challenges serving witness citations due to the volume of personal citations and the need to balance this with other operational commitments
  • There is ineffective consideration, by both organisations, of the adequacy of existing technology and lack of digital solutions.

We have looked at the current methods of citation in the sheriff court and the impact of being cited as a witness, particularly in light of the Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform (Scotland) Act 2025. This mandates trauma-informed practices for investigations, prosecutions and court proceedings and – while we found evidence of a desire to ensure a trauma-informed approach by both organisations – there is still a long way to go.

We have also considered whether the experience of being cited to attend court as a witness can be improved, and whether there is scope to modernise and achieve greater efficiency and effectiveness in the citation process, including through use of digital technology.

We found that while many organisations across Scotland communicate with their customers digitally, and electronic communication is used routinely by most people in their daily lives, most citations for civilian witnesses are issued by post. This is not compatible with an effective, modern criminal justice process that has service delivery and customer care at its heart.

We also drew significant learning from how witnesses are cited in other jurisdictions where digital citation methods work effectively. With this in mind, we make recommendations for a more efficient, witness-centred approach to citation.

This is also in keeping with the Scottish Government’s Digital Strategy for Scotland, launched in November 2025,[3] which aims to use technology to deliver improved public services in Scotland.

We would like to thank those from COPFS, Police Scotland and the Scottish Police Authority, along with all the witnesses and victims who shared their experiences of the citation process with us. Their views helped shape our findings and recommendations.

Deborah O’Brien Demick

HM Chief Inspector of Prosecution in Scotland

Craig Naylor

HM Chief Inspector of Constabulary

March 2026

Next
Key findings
Site Map
Cookie Policy
Accessibility
Data Protection
Freedom of Information
© 2026 HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland

We use the necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. These will be set only if you accept.

For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookie Policy.